Return-to-Play Outcomes in Elite Athletes After Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review

Compartilhe ►

To systematically review RTP outcomes in elite athletes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc replacement (CDR), or posterior foraminotomy (PF) surgery.

Sports Health 2021 Apr 15;19417381211007813. doi: 10.1177/19417381211007813. Online ahead of print.

Return-to-Play Outcomes in Elite Athletes After Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review

Joseph Leider 1Joshua David Piche 2Moin Khan 3Ilyas Aleem 2Affiliations expand

Abstract

Context: Return-to-play (RTP) outcomes in elite athletes after cervical spine surgery are currently unknown.

Objective: To systematically review RTP outcomes in elite athletes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc replacement (CDR), or posterior foraminotomy (PF) surgery.

Data sources: EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane, and Medline databases from inception until April 2020. Keywords included elite athletesreturn to playACDFforaminotomy, and cervical disc replacement.

Study selection: Eligible studies included those that reported RTP outcomes in elite athletes after cervical spine surgery.

Study design: Systematic review.

Level of evidence: Level 4.

Data extraction: Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers.

Results: The primary outcomes of interest were rates and timing of RTP. Secondary outcomes included performance on RTP. A total of 1720 studies were initially screened. After inclusion criteria were applied, 13 studies with a total of 349 patients were included. A total of 262 (75%) played football, 37 (11%) played baseball, 19 (5%) played rugby, 10 (3%) played basketball, 10 (3%) played hockey, 9 (3%) were wresters, and 2 (1%) played soccer. ACDF was reported in 13 studies, PF in 3 studies, and CDR in 2 studies. The majority of studies suggest that RTP after surgical management is safe in elite athletes who are asymptomatic after their procedure and may lead to higher rates and earlier times of RTP. There is limited evidence regarding RTP or outcomes after CDR or multilevel surgery.

Conclusion: The management and RTP in elite athletes after cervical spine injury is a highly complex and multifactorial topic. The overall evidence in this review suggests that RTP in asymptomatic athletes after both ACDF and PF is safe, and there is little evidence for decreased performance postoperatively. Surgical management results in a higher RTP rate compared with athletes managed conservatively.

Keywords: ACDF; cervical; cervical disc replacement; elite athletes; foraminotomy; return to play; spine; surgery.

Similar articles

See all similar articles