Personalizar preferências de consentimento

Utilizamos cookies para ajudar você a navegar com eficiência e executar certas funções. Você encontrará informações detalhadas sobre todos os cookies sob cada categoria de consentimento abaixo.

Os cookies que são classificados com a marcação “Necessário” são armazenados em seu navegador, pois são essenciais para possibilitar o uso de funcionalidades básicas do site.... 

Sempre ativo

Os cookies necessários são cruciais para as funções básicas do site e o site não funcionará como pretendido sem eles. Esses cookies não armazenam nenhum dado pessoalmente identificável.

Bem, cookies para exibir.

Cookies funcionais ajudam a executar certas funcionalidades, como compartilhar o conteúdo do site em plataformas de mídia social, coletar feedbacks e outros recursos de terceiros.

Bem, cookies para exibir.

Cookies analíticos são usados para entender como os visitantes interagem com o site. Esses cookies ajudam a fornecer informações sobre métricas o número de visitantes, taxa de rejeição, fonte de tráfego, etc.

Bem, cookies para exibir.

Os cookies de desempenho são usados para entender e analisar os principais índices de desempenho do site, o que ajuda a oferecer uma melhor experiência do usuário para os visitantes.

Bem, cookies para exibir.

Os cookies de anúncios são usados para entregar aos visitantes anúncios personalizados com base nas páginas que visitaram antes e analisar a eficácia da campanha publicitária.

Bem, cookies para exibir.

Current Accuracy of Augmented Reality Neuronavigation Systems: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Compartilhe ►

Review World Neurosurg  2020 Nov 13;S1878-8750(20)32404-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.029. 

Current Accuracy of Augmented Reality Neuronavigation Systems: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

T Fick 1J A M van Doormaal 2E W Hoving 3P W A Willems 4T P C van Doormaal 5Affiliations expand

Abstract

Background: Augmented reality neuronavigation (ARN) systems can overlay three-dimensional anatomy and pathology without the need for a two-dimensional external monitor. Accuracy is crucial for their clinical applicability. We performed a systematic review regarding the reported accuracy of ARN systems and compared them with the accuracy of conventional infrared neuronavigation (CIN).

Objective: Explore the current navigation accuracy of ARN systems and compare them with CIN.

Methods: Pubmed and Embase were searched for ARN and CIN systems. For ARN: type of system, method of patient-to-image registration, accuracy method and accuracy of the system was noted. For CIN: navigation accuracy, expressed as target registration error (TRE), was noted. A meta-analysis was performed comparing the TRE of ARN and CIN systems.

Results: 35 studies were included, 12 for ARN and 23 for CIN. ARN systems were divided into head-mounted display and heads-up display. In ARN, four methods were encountered for patient-to-image registration, of which point-pair matching was the one most frequently used. Five methods for assessing accuracy were described. 94 TRE measurements of ARN systems were compared with 9058 TRE measurements of CIN systems. Mean TRE was 2.5 mm (CI 95% 0.7 – 4.4) for ARN systems and 2.6 mm (CI 95% 2.1 – 3.1) for CIN systems.

Conclusions: In ARN, there seems to be lack of agreement regarding the best method to assess accuracy. Nevertheless, ARN systems seem able to achieve an accuracy comparable with CIN systems. Future studies should be prospective and compare TREs which should be measured in a standardized fashion.

Keywords: Accuracy; Augmented Reality; Neuronavigation.

Similar articles