Personalizar preferências de consentimento

Utilizamos cookies para ajudar você a navegar com eficiência e executar certas funções. Você encontrará informações detalhadas sobre todos os cookies sob cada categoria de consentimento abaixo.

Os cookies que são classificados com a marcação “Necessário” são armazenados em seu navegador, pois são essenciais para possibilitar o uso de funcionalidades básicas do site.... 

Sempre ativo

Os cookies necessários são cruciais para as funções básicas do site e o site não funcionará como pretendido sem eles. Esses cookies não armazenam nenhum dado pessoalmente identificável.

Bem, cookies para exibir.

Cookies funcionais ajudam a executar certas funcionalidades, como compartilhar o conteúdo do site em plataformas de mídia social, coletar feedbacks e outros recursos de terceiros.

Bem, cookies para exibir.

Cookies analíticos são usados para entender como os visitantes interagem com o site. Esses cookies ajudam a fornecer informações sobre métricas o número de visitantes, taxa de rejeição, fonte de tráfego, etc.

Bem, cookies para exibir.

Os cookies de desempenho são usados para entender e analisar os principais índices de desempenho do site, o que ajuda a oferecer uma melhor experiência do usuário para os visitantes.

Bem, cookies para exibir.

Os cookies de anúncios são usados para entregar aos visitantes anúncios personalizados com base nas páginas que visitaram antes e analisar a eficácia da campanha publicitária.

Bem, cookies para exibir.

Surgical Versus Non-Operative Treatment of Hadley Type IIA Odontoid Fractures

Compartilhe ►

Full article access for Neurosurgery subscribers at Neurosurgery-Online.com.

BACKGROUND: Type II odontoid fractures with additional chip fragments are rare in clinical practice, accounting for less than 10% of all odontoid fractures. Hadley et al. were the first to describe these fractures as an individual subtype (IIA).

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the outcome of patients following surgical or non-operative treatment of Hadley type-IIA odontoid fractures.

METHODS: We analyzed the records of 46 patients with an average age of 64 years at the time of injury. 25 patients underwent surgical stabilization by anterior screw fixation (ASF) and were entered into study group A; 21 patients were treated non-operatively by halo vest immobilisation (HVI) and included into study group B.

RESULTS: 37 patients (84%) returned to their pre-injury activity level and were satisfied with their treatment. Using the Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire to quantify the clinical outcome, we had an overall outcome score of 21.8. Comparing between the study groups, we did not find a significant difference in the overall clinical outcome. Bony fusion was achieved in 35 patients (80%). Comparing between the two study groups, we had a non-union rate of 13% after ASF and a significantly higher rate of 30% following HVI. Failures of reduction or fixation occurred in 12 patients (27%), with a significantly higher failure rate after HVI.

CONCLUSION: Hadley type IIA odontoid fractures are inherently unstable and impede proper realignment. These fractures have a significantly increased risk for secondary loss of reduction and bony non-union, particularly following non-operative management. Early surgery should be considered to avoid further complications.

Full article access for Neurosurgery subscribers at Neurosurgery-Online.com.

http://neurosurgerycns.wordpress.com/2011/09/13/ahead-of-print-surgical-versus-non-operative-treatment-of-hadley-type-iia-odontoid-fractures/

Sent with MobileRSS for iPhone

Júlio Leonardo B. Pereira
https://neurocirurgiabr.com
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7687651239699170