Endoscope-assisted strip craniectomy and postoperative helmet therapy for treatment of craniosynosto

Neurosurgical FOCUS, Volume 31, Issue 2, Page E5, August 2011.

John Berry-Candelario, M.D., M.P.H., Emily B. Ridgway, M.D., Ronald T. Grondin, M.D., Gary F. Rogers, M.D., J.D., M.B.A., and Mark R. Proctor, M.D.

Object

The primary goals of treatment in the infant with craniosynostosis are to correct the deformity and allow for adequate brain growth in as safe and effective a manner as possible. Herein, the authors present the results of treating craniosynostosis using an endoscope-assisted strip craniectomy and postoperative helmet therapy (EASC + PHT) in the hopes of providing further evidence of its role in the treatment of multiple different forms of craniosynostosis. This is a retrospective review of the patients treated with this technique at Children’s Hospital Boston.

Methods

The electronic medical records of all children with craniosynostosis treated using this technique were reviewed retrospectively. A priori, data were collected for deformity type, patient age at surgery, number of transfusions, operative time, length of hospital stay, and anthropometric measurements.

Results

One hundred seventy-three patients (61 females and 112 males) were treated at our institution between July 2004 and March 2011 with EASC + PHT. The mean operative time was 46.30 minutes. Eight (4.6%) of the 173 patients received blood transfusions. The average length of hospital stay was 1.35 days, with the majority of patients being discharged the day after surgery. All complications and any patient who required additional craniofacial reconstructions are discussed. In addition, a subgroup analysis was done for patients who had undergone surgery and had longer than 1 year of follow-up.

Conclusions

The authors’ growing database of patients supports the experiences described by others that early treatment of craniosynostosis with an EASC + PHT is a safe and efficacious technique. In addition, cost reduction due to decreased hospital stay and limitation of blood transfusions are demonstrable benefits associated with the use of this technique.

http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2011.6.FOCUS1198?ai=rw&mi=3ba5z2&af=R



Categories: Pediatric

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: