Pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension – Is the fixed threshold value of elevated LP opening pressure set too high?

Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017 Nov;21(6):833-841. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 12.

Pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension – Is the fixed threshold value of elevated LP opening pressure set too high?

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in children is a rare condition of unknown etiology and various clinical presentations. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate if our pediatric IIH study group fulfilled the revised diagnostic criteria for IIH published in 2013, particularly with regard to clinical presentation and threshold value of an elevated lumbar puncture opening pressure. Additionally we investigated the potential utilization of MR-based and fundoscopic methods of estimating intracranial pressure for improved diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

Clinical data were collected retrospectively from twelve pediatric patients diagnosed with IIH between 2008 and 2012 and revised diagnostic criteria were applied. Comparison with non-invasive methods for measuring intracranial pressure, MRI-based measurement (MR-ICP) and venous ophthalmodynamometry was performed.

RESULTS:

Only four of the twelve children (33%) fulfilled the revised diagnostic criteria for a definite diagnosis of IIH. Regarding noninvasive methods, MR-ICP (n = 6) showed a significantly higher mean of intracranial pressure compared to a healthy age- and sex-matched control group (p = 0.0043). Venous ophthalmodynamometry (n = 4) showed comparable results to invasive lumbar puncture.

CONCLUSION:

The revised diagnostic criteria for IIH may be too strict especially in children without papilledema. MR-ICP and venous ophthalmodynamometry are promising complementary procedures for monitoring disease progression and response to treatment.

KEYWORDS:

Children; Diagnostic criteria; MRI based measurement; Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome; Venous ophthalmodynamometry

PMID:

 

28838819

 

DOI:

 

10.1016/j.ejpn.2017.08.002


Categories: Pediatric

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: